In a significant turn of events, the Bar Council of India's (BCI) Disciplinary Committee has overturned a five-year suspension order against Advocate Nitin Kumar Saxena, which had been imposed by the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh. Saxena had challenged the suspension, arguing that there were procedural mistakes and jurisdictional overreach in the case.
The case, identified as B.C.L Tr. Case No. 59/2024, centered around allegations from a complainant, Smt. Geeta Sahu, who accused Saxena of fraud, interference in her family matters, and misusing his position as an advocate. However, these incidents reportedly took place between 2015 and 2018, before Saxena was even enrolled as an advocate in 2020.
Key findings from the Disciplinary Committee's review included several crucial points:
1. Jurisdictional Issues: The Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh did not have the authority to judge actions that allegedly occurred before Saxena's enrollment as an advocate.
2. Complaint Delay: The complaint was filed in 2022, raising questions about its timeliness. Additionally, there were no supporting police reports or prior complaints from the relevant time period.
3. Lack of Sufficient Evidence: The bank statements presented by the complainant did not match the allegations of financial misconduct or provide solid evidence against Saxena.
Given these findings, the BCI ruled that the suspension order was based on serious errors by the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh. They determined that the accusations fell outside the Bar Council's jurisdiction and lacked credible supporting evidence. As a result, the suspension was overturned, and the case has been sent back to the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh for further review, with instructions to reassess the records.
This decision reflects the importance of procedural fairness and evidence-based judgments in legal matters, ensuring that advocates are protected from unwarranted disciplinary actions.
.jpeg&w=80&h=80&crop-to-fit)
